総経理よりそちら一部のスケジュールを聞いております的繁體中文翻譯

総経理よりそちら一部のスケジュールを聞いております

総経理よりそちら一部のスケジュールを聞いております
0/5000
原始語言: -
目標語言: -
結果 (繁體中文) 1: [復制]
復制成功!
我正在聽總統的一些日程表。
正在翻譯中..
結果 (繁體中文) 2:[復制]
復制成功!
Background. Cellulitis is a common acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection. Studies have demonstrated that the majority of cellulitis infections are due to ß-hemolytic streptococci species, and less frequently Staphylococcus aureus. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is not a usual cause of cellulitis, and current guidelines by the Infectious Disease Society of America do not recommend agents targeting MRSA for mild or moderate cellulitis without the presence of patient risk-factors. Despite this, there has been an increased practice of prescribing agents that target MRSA for the treatment of cellulitis in the outpatient setting. This practice of “double coverage” with an anti-streptococci and anti-MRSA agent has not been validated in cases of uncomplicated cellulitis. The primary objectives of this study were to determine the efficacy and safety of single versus dual antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of cellulitis in the outpatient setting.<br><br>Methods. Clinician education was provided prior to study initiation. Patients aged 18 years and older who were discharged from the emergency department on a minimum of one oral antibiotic were screened for inclusion. Enrolled patients were contacted 10 days postdischarge to determine outcomes.<br><br>Results. Two hundred thirty two patients were screened for inclusion and 57 patients had baseline data analyzed for intent-to-treat analysis. Of these, 26 patients had data available for outcomes analysis. Baseline characteristics were well matched between single and dual therapy groups, including co-morbidities, risk factors, and infection characteristics. For 46% of the patients reached at 10 days, clinical cure was achieved in 75% (9/12) of the single therapy group, and 79% (11/14) of the dual therapy group (p = 0.99). Eight percent (1/12) of patients experienced an adverse event in the single therapy group compared to 50% (7/14) of patients in the dual therapy group (p = 0.03).<br><br>Conclusion. Among patients discharged from the emergency department with a diagnosis of cellulitis, the addition of a second antibiotic targeting MRSA did not improve clinical cure and was associated with more adverse events.<br><br>Disclosures. All authors: No reported disclosures ...
正在翻譯中..
結果 (繁體中文) 3:[復制]
復制成功!
我從總經理那裡聽說了那邊的一部分排程<br>
正在翻譯中..
 
其它語言
本翻譯工具支援: 世界語, 中文, 丹麥文, 亞塞拜然文, 亞美尼亞文, 伊博文, 俄文, 保加利亞文, 信德文, 偵測語言, 優魯巴文, 克林貢語, 克羅埃西亞文, 冰島文, 加泰羅尼亞文, 加里西亞文, 匈牙利文, 南非柯薩文, 南非祖魯文, 卡納達文, 印尼巽他文, 印尼文, 印度古哈拉地文, 印度文, 吉爾吉斯文, 哈薩克文, 喬治亞文, 土庫曼文, 土耳其文, 塔吉克文, 塞爾維亞文, 夏威夷文, 奇切瓦文, 威爾斯文, 孟加拉文, 宿霧文, 寮文, 尼泊爾文, 巴斯克文, 布爾文, 希伯來文, 希臘文, 帕施圖文, 庫德文, 弗利然文, 德文, 意第緒文, 愛沙尼亞文, 愛爾蘭文, 拉丁文, 拉脫維亞文, 挪威文, 捷克文, 斯洛伐克文, 斯洛維尼亞文, 斯瓦希里文, 旁遮普文, 日文, 歐利亞文 (奧里雅文), 毛利文, 法文, 波士尼亞文, 波斯文, 波蘭文, 泰文, 泰盧固文, 泰米爾文, 海地克里奧文, 烏克蘭文, 烏爾都文, 烏茲別克文, 爪哇文, 瑞典文, 瑟索托文, 白俄羅斯文, 盧安達文, 盧森堡文, 科西嘉文, 立陶宛文, 索馬里文, 紹納文, 維吾爾文, 緬甸文, 繁體中文, 羅馬尼亞文, 義大利文, 芬蘭文, 苗文, 英文, 荷蘭文, 菲律賓文, 葡萄牙文, 蒙古文, 薩摩亞文, 蘇格蘭的蓋爾文, 西班牙文, 豪沙文, 越南文, 錫蘭文, 阿姆哈拉文, 阿拉伯文, 阿爾巴尼亞文, 韃靼文, 韓文, 馬來文, 馬其頓文, 馬拉加斯文, 馬拉地文, 馬拉雅拉姆文, 馬耳他文, 高棉文, 等語言的翻譯.

Copyright ©2025 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: