Thank you, Manish. The only time th

Thank you, Manish. The only time the IQ disappointed me was when I first purchased the lens and saw the low contrast images. I looked inside and thought the dust that was on the inside the barrel element was permanent. It turned out the "dust" was actually the felt lining in the tube flaking off. I was able to clean and blow it out and suddenly the lens was sharp and contrasty. Hasn't disappointed me since.

If you like shooting pictures of planets (they look like dots on the sensor), though, note that the planet won't be round but this weird shape. Someone documented it when looking for an astronomical lens and he ended up passing on it.

As for shooting at f/5.6, I do it all the time. I shot my son pitching at a little league game and even though I shot a full length picture I was able to enlarge a little area and see his eyelashes. They weren't tack sharp like what a D800 would give, but sharp enough for what a D700 would. I wish I could post the picture, but my better half wasn't too keen on it

結果 (繁體中文) 1:

謝謝你，Manish。 唯一一次讓我失望的智商是當我第一次購買的鏡頭，看到低對比度的圖像。 我朝裡面一看，還以為是在裡面的桶元素是永久的灰塵。 原來"塵"實際上毛氈襯管已經剝落。 我是能夠清潔和吹出來和鏡頭突然間尖銳和高對比。 以來我並沒有感到失望......

如果你喜歡拍攝圖片的行星 （他們看起來像感應器上的點），不過，注意到地球不是圓但這奇怪的形狀。 有人記載它找一個天文的鏡頭的時候和他結束了旅客...

至於射擊在 f/5.6，做它所有的時間。 我殺了我的兒子在一個小聯盟遊戲投球和即使拍的完整長度的圖片就能放大一個社區域，看到他的睫毛。 他們不是大頭釘鋒利像 D800 會給的但夠什麼 D700 夏普將...... 我希望可以發佈到該圖片，但我的另一半並不熱衷於它

結果 (繁體中文) 3:

謝謝， Manish。當智商辜負了我是之時I首先購買了透鏡并且看了低對比圖像。我看起來裡面，并且認為是在裡面桶元素的塵土永久。它結果「塵土」實際上是在剝落的管的毛氈襯裡。我能清洗，并且吹滅它和突然透鏡是鋒利和明暗差別強烈的。未辜負我您喜歡拍攝行星的since.

If (他們的圖片看起來像在傳感器的小點)，雖然，注意到，行星不會圍繞，但是這奇怪的形狀。某人提供了它，當尋找一個天文學透鏡時，并且他導致通過在射擊的it.

As在f/5.6，我一直做它。我射擊了我的兒子投球在一場小職業棒球聯盟比賽，并且，即使我拍攝了一張全長圖片我能擴大一點區域和看他的睫毛。他們不是大頭釘銳利，如D800將給，但是銳利足够D700的會。我祝願我可能張貼圖片，但是我的配偶對it
不是太敏銳的